Overview
-
Founded Date March 9, 1944
-
Sectors Mechanical Design Engineer
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 7
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and serves as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 model provides responses similar to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the ability of these 2 nations to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more recognized competitors has actually been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the very first shot at what is becoming a global AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for use, adjustment, watching, and designing files for building functions. [13] The company reportedly strongly recruits young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading given that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, implying its code is easily offered for use, adjustment, and watching. This includes permission to access and use the source code, along with style files, for constructing purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic general intelligence lab dedicated to research study establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short amount of time. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the driver for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its technology to prevent the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on information. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to the majority of brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people with no computer science background to help its technology understand other topics and understanding areas, consisting of being able to generate poetry and perform well on the infamously tough Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered for free to both scientists and business users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and accountable downstream use” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark results greater than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was essentially the same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the 2 Base models was also released concurrently, gotten by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed specialists” that might not be. They discovered this to aid with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can end up being extremely relied on, while other experts may be rarely used, wasting parameters. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are equally used then causes professionals to replicate the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capabilities that are often used, and let the routed experts to learn the peripheral capabilities that are rarely utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward design was a process benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit design was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was constantly updated throughout training to avoid reward hacking. This resulted in the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in two stages. The first phase was trained to resolve mathematics and coding issues. This phase utilized 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second phase was trained to be useful, safe, and follow rules. This phase utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and safety benefit designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit design was manually set. All qualified reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they found that RL on reasoning information had “distinct characteristics” various from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on reasoning could enhance over more training steps. [31]
The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and experienced similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of professionals (MoE) variant previously published in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was generated by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It consisted of a greater ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, shows, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by “expert models”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “expert designs” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic information generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the professional designs were RL utilizing an undefined benefit function.
– Each specialist model was trained to generate just synthetic thinking information in one specific domain (mathematics, programs, logic).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and excessive length”.
4. Model-based benefit designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data consisting of both last reward and chain-of-thought resulting in the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective but free-form responses, and questions without unbiased responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was calculated for math problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programs problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to attain performance. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, needing unique GEMM regimens to collect accurately. They utilized a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific device each specialist was on in order to avoid specific makers being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available through DeepSeek’s API, in addition to via a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached an option much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information created by R1. [47]
A conversation in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks about the reasoning process in the mind and then supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here answer here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of two types (other types were not specified): accuracy benefits and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was checking whether a boxed answer is right (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was inspecting whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these problems and further improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, but likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the produced thinking had an incorrect final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and responses
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly responds to questions, solves logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have required just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested developing its latest AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal expense has been recognized as possibly challenging the worldwide dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and recommendations on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export constraints on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models as a result “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the main application programs user interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For instance, the design refuses to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce a response, but then erases it shortly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and limitations can just be eliminated to a limited level in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through serene methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into offering specific answers to some of these topics by requesting in its response to switch specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some professionals fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms say “We store the details we gather in secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In action, the Italian information security authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually begun a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of individual information. [83]
Expert system industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design outshines Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model appears to be one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely outstanding”: “We must take the developments out of China very, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily limited new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions powerful cyber, information personal privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.